Check the brief before you press play
Check the video against the brief, watch it once without stopping, then write each note with a timestamp and a clear request. Label every note as a factual correction, a creative preference or a new request outside the agreed scope. Send one consolidated set of notes per round, agreed by one decision maker.
Feedback goes wrong when reviewers judge the video against what they imagine instead of what was agreed. Spend two minutes with the brief first:
- Audience: who is this for?
- Objective and one message: what should a viewer understand or do?
- Placement: where will it play, and in which shape?
- Deliverables: which edits and versions are part of this project?
Then check which stage you're reviewing, because each stage invites different notes.
Scroll horizontally to see the full table.
| Stage | What to focus on | What to leave for later |
|---|---|---|
| Rough cut | Story, order, selected answers, length; flag factual errors and uncleared material immediately | Finishing details not yet applied |
| Fine cut | Pacing, music, graphics, captions; repeat fact and permission checks | New creative ideas outside the brief |
| Final | Spelling, names, titles, numbers, logos, legal lines, captions | New ideas |
Raise structural concerns at the rough cut when possible. A factual error, privacy issue or unapproved appearance needs attention whenever it is found; the review stage is not a reason to leave it in.
Watch once for purpose
Watch the whole video without stopping, the way your audience will:
- On the right screen. A vertical video on a phone, a website film on a laptop.
- With sound off, then on, for anything going to social feeds. Does the message survive on captions and on-screen text alone?
Afterward, answer three questions in one line each:
- Does it make the one point in the brief?
- Would the intended viewer know what to do next?
- Is anything wrong, unapproved or risky?
If the answers are yes, yes and no, most of your notes will be small. If the first answer is no, say so plainly before any timestamped notes. A list of 40 small fixes hides the one note that matters.
Write timestamped notes the editor can act on
Watch a second time and stop for each note. Every note has four parts:
- Timestamp or range: "0:14" or "0:14–0:19".
- What you see or hear: the current state.
- What you want instead: the request.
- Why, when it isn't obvious.
Describe the problem clearly and let the editor propose solutions for creative issues. Be exact for factual ones.
Scroll horizontally to see the full table.
| Instead of | Write |
|---|---|
| "Make it pop." | "0:00–0:03: open on the finished product, not the front door." |
| "The music is off." | "Music feels slower than our brand. Try something with more energy, kept under the voices." |
| "Fix the title." | "0:21 name title: should read 'Operations Manager', not 'Office Manager'." |
| "Too long." | "0:48–1:02 repeats the point made at 0:30. Can it go?" |
| "This section feels unclear." | "0:35: this answer sounds unsure. Is there another take of the same answer?" |
Check every name, job title, phone number, web address, price, date and offer term character by character, including captions. For anything that will run as an ad, confirm you can back up each claim. The FTC's advertising guidance for small businesses calls for evidence supporting claims before an ad runs. This is general information, not legal advice.
Sort every note: correction, preference or new scope
This is the step that saves the most time. Label each note with one of three types.
Scroll horizontally to see the full table.
| Type | What it means | Examples | What usually happens |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factual correction | Something in the video is wrong, outdated or not approved | Misspelled name, wrong title, old logo, wrong phone number, inaccurate claim, a person without a signed release, private information visible | Fixed, and listed first |
| Creative preference | The video is accurate, but you want it to feel or flow differently | Music choice, a different shot, pacing, order of answers, color | Weighed by the decision maker; part of a revision round |
| New scope | A request beyond what was agreed or filmed | A new scene or reshoot, an added person, a different message, an extra version or placement, a new length, translations, raw footage | Discussed before work starts; may need an updated proposal |
Two notes look similar but belong in different rows. "Our phone number changed last week" is a correction. "Can we also make a 15-second version for a new campaign?" is new scope, even though it sounds small.
Labeling isn't about blame. It tells everyone which notes the current agreement covers and which need a conversation first. Our guide to what changes the scope of a video project explains why some small-sounding requests aren't small.
Make the plan practical.
Keep your answers and unresolved questions together before the project conversation.
Use the worksheetConsolidate before you send
Most review problems are internal. Three people send three emails, two notes contradict each other, and the editor has to guess.
- Name one decision maker before the review starts. That person collects every note and makes the final call.
- Collect notes in one document. Use the template below, shared with every reviewer.
- Resolve conflicts internally. If marketing wants it shorter and the owner wants the full story, decide before you send.
- Bring in required reviewers early. Legal, compliance or a franchise office should see the rough cut, not only the final.
- Agree a cutoff. Tell reviewers when to submit comments and ask the editor how later notes will be handled; do not assume a deadline or extra round is included.
- Identify required reviewers early. If someone must join later, explain their authority and the decisions already agreed so important checks are handled without conflicting instructions.
How revision rounds work
A revision round is usually one consolidated set of notes and the new version that answers it. Your agreement says how many rounds are included and how review timing works, so read it before the first preview. Lonestarring's monthly Core includes two revision rounds; production revisions are recorded in the project's proposal.
If you're out of rounds, or a note is new scope, ask for an updated proposal before the work starts. When the video is right, approve it in writing so everyone knows which version is final.
Reviews go more smoothly when the work before the shoot was clear. See how to write a business video brief and, for monthly content, preparing for a monthly content shoot. More in our brand and ad video guides.
Video review template
Copy this into a shared document. One template per video, per round.
Project and video: ____________________
Version reviewed (file name or date): ____________________
Stage: Rough cut / Fine cut / Final
Watched on: Phone / Laptop / Both · Sound off / Sound on / Both
Round: ___ of ___ in the agreement
Reviewers consulted (roles): ____________________
Decision maker (role): ____________________
Purpose check (one line each):
- Makes the one message in the brief? ____________________
- Clear next step for the viewer? ____________________
- Anything wrong, unapproved or risky? ____________________
Scroll horizontally to see the full table.
| # | Timestamp | What we see or hear | Requested change | Type (Correction / Preference / New scope) | Must or nice to have |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 |
Example rows (hypothetical):
Scroll horizontally to see the full table.
| # | Timestamp | What we see or hear | Requested change | Type | Must or nice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0:21 | Title reads "Office Manager" | Change to "Operations Manager" | Correction | Must |
| 2 | 0:40–0:52 | Slow music under the interview | Try a track with more energy | Preference | Nice |
| 3 | End | Only the agreed full-length edit exists | Request an extra short version for a new placement | New scope | Discuss |
Decision: Approved as is / Approved after the corrections listed / Another round needed
Signed off by (role) and date: ____________________
How we can help
For monthly content, every video is ready for review within 72 hours of the shoot, weekends excluded: Everyday videos ready to post, Signature videos as rough cuts. Videos are reviewed in a shared Google Drive folder, with two revision rounds. Production timelines and revision scope are confirmed in the proposal; final monthly versions follow feedback within the revision rounds. See how monthly content works and video production.