Make two approvals explicit
Approve the purpose, topics and destinations before reviewing individual edits. Give one person the job of consolidating factual checks and creative feedback. The board below keeps both approvals visible.
A strategy sets the direction; the weekly content plan identifies what the business wants to explain next and where each item will be used. We prepare a separate shot list for the monthly shoot. An edit review answers whether a particular video is accurate and ready for its agreed use. Approving the idea does not settle spelling, a current date or a detail that changed during filming.
Mark those decisions separately. A useful row might show “topic approved; video awaiting review.” That is more informative than one green box labeled “approved.” Avoid copying the same status to every platform version without checking that version.
The monthly shoot preparation guide covers people and spaces. Reviewing a business video covers timestamped edit notes. This board connects those tasks to the publishing calendar rather than replacing either.
Assign an approver and the factual checks
Choose one role that can resolve conflicting comments and return a decision. Other people can check their own area: operations confirms hours and availability, the person responsible for a service verifies its description, and the authorized business reviewer checks any claim that needs evidence.
For advertising, the FTC's small-business advertising guidance says claims need support before the ad runs. A calendar checkbox does not create that support. Send the unresolved wording back to the responsible reviewer instead of inventing an answer. This is planning information, not legal advice.
Use these questions for every time-sensitive item:
- Is the service, offer or event still available as described?
- Are its dates, hours and conditions confirmed by the business?
- Does the destination link reach the intended page or booking action?
- Has every required reviewer seen the actual version being approved?
- Who should be told if the underlying fact changes after approval?
Record roles and statuses in the shared board. Keep customer messages, private contact details and account credentials in the business's own systems.
Give each calendar row a specific next action
A posting date alone does not show what needs to happen first. Add the next decision and the person responsible: verify the booking link, approve the event date, consolidate edit notes or confirm the final version.
Agree review dates around actual availability. If a decision maker is away, flag it before assigning a posting date. Do not copy a sample turnaround from another provider and assume it applies to your agreement.
Check the destination as well as the content. For example, Google's Business Profile post guidance separates updates, offers and events. Those choices use different information; an offer has dates and terms, while an event needs its own schedule. Google also reviews posts, and a pending or unapproved post is not public. Scheduling something is not proof that a customer can see it.
For other platforms, check the actual placement and account's publishing controls. This guide does not prescribe a universal best posting time or promise that a specific schedule increases reach.
Make the plan practical.
Keep your answers and unresolved questions together before the project conversation.
Use the worksheetCopy this calendar approval board
Use one row for each intended publication. Reuse an asset reference across rows when the same video has several agreed destinations. Fill dates from the real plan; the blank board supplies no deadlines.
Scroll horizontally to see the full table.
| Item and business purpose | Destination / intended date | Plan decision | Current file version | Fact check / responsible role | Edit decision | Next action / agreed review date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ____________________ | ____________________ | Pending / approved | ____________________ | ____________________ | Pending / changes / approved | ____________________ |
| ____________________ | ____________________ | Pending / approved | ____________________ | ____________________ | Pending / changes / approved | ____________________ |
| ____________________ | ____________________ | Pending / approved | ____________________ | ____________________ | Pending / changes / approved | ____________________ |
Keep the board concise. The file version points to the actual preview; detailed edit notes live with that review. A changed version returns to the relevant check rather than quietly keeping the previous approval.
Example (hypothetical): a fitness studio plans a video explaining a new class. The topic and shoot are approved, but the class time changes. The operations role confirms the new time, the approver checks the revised text and destination, and the person publishing receives the approved version. Until those checks are resolved, the board shows the item as waiting for a business fact. This describes a preparation decision, not an actual client or a promised result.
Decide what happens when a row cannot proceed
Send one consolidated message that identifies the affected item, the unresolved decision and the proposed next step. Useful options to discuss include moving its date, using a different already-approved item or revising the disputed wording. Ask what the agreement permits before treating a replacement, new edit or reshoot as included.
If something changes after publication, identify the actual affected posts and the person who can correct them. Do not assume one calendar edit automatically updates every live platform.
The board can also reveal a recurring bottleneck. Several rows waiting on the same person suggest an approval-capacity problem. More videos will not solve that by themselves. Adjust the responsibilities or the next plan using facts from the business.
How our weekly approvals work
In our monthly process, we agree your strategy and visual identity, then review and approve the content plan one week at a time. After the fixed monthly shoot, every video is ready for review within 72 hours, weekends excluded: Everyday videos ready to post and Signature videos as rough cuts. Final versions follow feedback within two revision rounds.
Content sent for approval counts as approved after three business days without a response; we send a reminder first. Late approvals move our deadlines by the same amount. Those are Lonestarring's agreed terms, not universal rules for other providers. Read your agreement and raise any factual or permission problem when it is found.
With publishing and weekday replies, we publish on the approved calendar. With content only, your team handles publishing and replies; separately confirm who drafts and approves the written text under posts. Browse the monthly content guides for the surrounding preparation tasks.